Today's blog entry was inspired by a ;remark by Andy Hone at Sidepodcast's   F1 photographers versus the democratisation of media

Do you honestly think that if the gates are open to anyone they  will go to obscure places on the circuit? No not a chance they will all want to be at the prime locations and it will just be even more uncomfortable for everyone.

I have deliberately not clarified "they" in the quote as this itself appears to be a point of disagreement. Suffice to say for the purposes of this entry, it's photographers wanting to take photos of F1-related things who don't currently get trackside access to do their photography.

The broader problem sparking this comment can be separated into separate pieces (links below go to specific comments so you don't have to wade through what at times was a very heated argument):

1. There  aren't enough photographers in place to record every important events at Grands Prix
2. There are sufficient photographers for the idea of extra ones to cause tension bordering on fear  
3. The main thing that causes 2), other than potential loss of livelihoods, is doubt over the quality of the incomers
4. The market for blog photography is heavily underserved
5. The situation described in 4) applies despite the likes of Paul-Henri Cahier making inroads into the sector  
6. The market is starting to use other methods to bridge the market gap alluded to in 4).

What we have here is a classic disruptive market opportunity. There's an information gap (1), a demonstrated resistance to the most obvious remedy from current providers (2), a barrier that could be removed to lower that resistance that the current system doesn't help remove (3), customers for those who exploit the information gap even if they aren't 100% successful (4), proof that it doesn't have to be an outsider who serves the market (5) and signals that the window of opportunity will close by itself if not appropriately exploited (6).

That last point is important. Without it, the resistance to the idea of providing for the bloggers' market would make provision there a niche at best. There's a reason why point (5) mentions only Paul-Henri Cahier. With it, the needs have to be served - by the current providers of photos if they're willing (with the potential for suitable recompense), by newcomers (or by piracy) if not. 

The experiences of other intellectual media (music, writing, movies) has shown that underserved markets will find ways of satisfying their needs. What F1 photography needs is a method of serving those needs in an economically satisfying way that respects the list of limitations and conditions given previously?

Wonder if tiered passes would work? The photographers with a excellent and extensive track record would get a particular level of pass (call it gold for the sake of this discussion) that would allow them to access all areas and have priority in any location.

Less experienced photographers who'd nonetheless demonstrated their skill could have a different pass (silver, maybe) that would allow them into any photographer-suitable trackside area (though perhaps not the paddock, which invariably seems to be full) but only if nobody with a gold pass was there at the time. If anyone with a gold pass decided to go there afterwards, the silver pass people would be asked to leave (extra marshals may be required to help, but at Grands Prix that shouldn't be too much of a problem). 

Newcomers could get a further different pass (bronze) and be assigned a spot in a place where past experience showed neither gold nor silver pass-holders went. Allowance would be made for the occasional gold or silver photographer who wanted to take photos from there. It would be especially useful for those photographers who are only able to reach one or two circuits in a given calender, because these would be the ones getting the least practise at shooting F1 and having them in set places would enable better scrutiny - not just of quality but of behaviour. 

Photographers would move up and down the scales based on what they were producing and the audience they were getting. I would anticipate the bronze-silver transition to be primarily done on quality and the silver-gold one to be mainly based on how many people and from how wide a range of sources were looking at their content.

The system would give newcomers a chance to prove themselves and perhaps to experiment with the photography model for bloggers and other places that need low-quality images, allow the experienced people to get "the shots" and go where they see fit, and also provide a method for transitioning between the two states as people get more confident in their skills and perhaps want to have a go at getting the big time.

No system is going to get everyone who wants to be a F1 photographer through the gates, nor need it do so. What this system does is meet a demonstrated need/desire in the market while still maintaining the quality of F1 photography and also not changing the system so sharply that current practitioners have no chance of competing. Yes, the current brigade will need different skills to thrive, but that's a different blog entry altogether.

A discussion in Sidepodcast yesterday led to the invention of a new variant of the old classic Monopoly - F1 Monopoly: Deal or No Deal Edition. 

It's just like Monopoly until you land on a Tax space or on someone else's property. Then the owner (or the banker, if it's a tax) makes you an offer. You can either accept the offer or take a card from the pile. The amount on the card is the amount you pay.

Also, instead of houses and hotels, you can buy multiple "boxes" to go on your properties.

And of course it's all themed. Purple for the FIA, light blue for Red Bull, red for Ferrari, light grey for McLaren, dark grey for Mercedes, gold for Renault, green for Force India, dark blue for Williams and white for Sauber. There are also 5 tracks that can be collected in the same way as the stations on the original Monopoly.

Hopefully it will get you through the few hours remaining until the F1 season restarts. Just 2 more things to say:

1) You have until 3 am GMT on March 26 (or the start of Free Practise 3, which is scheduled to start at that time) to put in your entries for the Pre-Season competition. Don't forget delivery to anywhere in the world is included in the prize.

2) It's my birthday on March 26. My fingers are crossed that Force India gives me a good qualifying session for a present.

I spent much of last night live-commenting on the opening round of the Intercontinental Le Mans Cup, the Sebring 12 Hours. It is also the opening round of the American Le Mans Series.

The race proved very exciting but was difficult to follow. To the organisers' credit, there was an attempt to make the series easier to follow than ever and I've heard the ESPN3.com coverage was excellent, at least for some people. However, only viewers in the USA could watch it that way, for international coverage was on a separate stream on americanlemans.com. This was a good idea, except that it appears that interest in the race was severely underestimated.

The official site's video coverage seriously lagged. By halfway through the second hour, it was three minutes behind the action and the stuttering on the audio was so bad I had to mute it. Thankfully two alternative audio streams were available. Not trusting the one hosted at the same site as the stuttering video, I opted for Radio Le Mans.

Radio Le Mans worked well during the afternoon, being smooth and consistent. Then I went to swimming club just before 6 pm GMT (3 1/2 hours into the race). I wasn't around to see it, but apparently there was a point in the action where the only information source available was Twitter. The video, all audio streams and both live timing systems were all down. The audio was back up and running by the time I was home at 7:30 pm GMT (5 1/2 hours into the race) but from then on everything was quite shaky. I had to reset the commentary four times between that point and the end of the race (something which had been unnecessary prior to going out). Even using Twitter was chancy because some people (including some official sources) were following the race using streams of varying timeliness.

Naturally, this was unsatisfactory to the many people watching. Sidepodcast's hour-by-hour visit recording system (known as Heartbeat) demonstrates this vividly. After steadily increasing in views during the hours between the race starting and 18:00 GMT, there is a sharp fall in viewers in the two hours following, probably due to people getting fed up and leaving. Indeed, by 20:00 GMT, the figures are only about twice as high as for the morning commenting, which is the quietest time of day for the blog. Yes, the figures recovered as the night progressed (though ignore midnight onwards because a second event, the Red Bull Crashed Ice event, was being live-commented there later on) but think how many more viewers would have been there if everything had worked correctly.

This is a very widespread problem in motorsport but rarely is it put in such stark relief. I know it's difficult to cater to the multitudes, especially when you have no idea of the volume of those multitudes (it was the first time ESPN had attempted to provide a visual service to international ALMS supporters and it was only the second race of this level the ALMS had attempted to live-stream internationally). Nonetheless, the message is clear.

Improve reliability and the potential rewards are huge.

Low reliability will carry a heavy price.

Much like endurance racing for the teams themselves, really. Aim for the sorts of reliability the GTC class had. Not those of LMP2*...

* - I do not believe I am offering any spoilers by saying that all 8 GTC cars, even the ones that didn't see the flag, completed more than 70% of the race distance (in other words, enough to be classified had this been an LMS race) and only one of the four LMP2 cars did so.

At long last, the LCMBP 2010 Season Review Podcast is available at last.fm for download. I will edit this entry later to add a transcript.

While you're wearing your headphones, please also take the time to listen to the Sidepodcast 2010 Season Review Megamix, where selected highlights can be heard alongside 18 other knowledgeable people's contributions.